⚙️ Input Parameters
✅ Perveance in optimal range
📌 Fixed Parameters
• Number of beamlets: 1280
• Hole diameter: 14 mm
• Grids: plasma + extraction + 5 acc.
• Beamline length: 25 m
• Vext/Vtot: 1/110
• P̃opt: 5×10⁻⁴ A m⁻² V⁻¹·⁵
• T: 293 K
🖼️ Accelerator Schematic
📊 Results
Total Extracted Current
—
A
Reduced Perveance Π
—
×10⁻⁴ A m⁻² V⁻¹·⁵
Average Beamlet Divergence ω
—
mrad
Accelerator optical transmission η
—
%
Accelerator Transmission including stripping ηacc
—
%
Power out of Accelerator
—
MW
Re-ionization ηreioniz
—
%
Total Neutralization η
—
%
Power at End of Beamline
—
MW
Beam Interception vs Perveance
Divergence vs Perveance
Beamlet Current Distribution
Power Budget
Gas Density Profile n(x)
Neutralization Efficiency vs Q
Physics Model
This ITER Heating Neutral Beam simulator models the acceleration and transport of a H⁻ ion
beam through a multi-gap electrostatic accelerator and a 25 m beamline. The beam is
extracted from a multi-aperture plasma source with 1280 beamlets, each with a circular
aperture of 14 mm diameter. The target for the beam source is 330 A/m², 870 keV in hydrogen,
while the neutralized beam power transmitted to ITER shall be of 16.7 MW.
See for the design description
R Hemsworth et al. New J. Phys. 19 (2017) 025005.
Beam Optics and Perveance
The quality of beam extraction is governed by the reduced perveance
Π~
= J / V
ext3/2, where J is the extracted current
density and V
ext is the extraction voltage.
When
Π~ matches
the optimal value
Π~opt = 5×10⁻⁴ A m⁻² V⁻¹·⁵, the beam is
well-focused and losses on the accelerator grids are minimized.
Deviations from the optimal perveance increase beam divergence ω and
reduce the beam interception efficiency η
interception.
For the accelerator physics, see
H.P.L. de Esch et al (2015) Nucl. Fusion 55 096001.
Accelerator Transmission
The total accelerator transmission is η
acc = η
interception · η
stripping.
The stripping loss L = 1 − η
stripping accounts for the
neutralization of H⁻ ions through collisions with residual gas molecules
inside the accelerator, which removes particles from the accelerated beam.
See for instance
Pimazzoni et al. Fus Eng Des 192 (2023) 113621 and references therein.
Neutralization and Re-ionization
After the accelerator, the beam enters a gas cell where H⁻ ions are
neutralized through single electron detachment:
H⁻ + H₂ → H⁰ + e + H₂,
characterized by the cross-section σ
−10.
The evolution of the negative and neutral beam fractions along the
beamline is governed by the system of ordinary differential equations:
dI⁻/dx = −σ
−10 · n(x) · I⁻
dI⁰/dx = +σ
−10 · n(x) · I⁻ − σ
01 · n(x) · I⁰
where σ
01 is the re-ionization cross-section for
H⁰ + H₂ → H⁺ + e + H₂. The analytical solution gives the
neutralization efficiency η
neut.
Beyond the gas cell,
only re-ionization acts on the neutral beam, giving
η
reioniz = exp(−σ
01 ∫
525 n(x) dx).
The total neutralization efficiency is
η = η
neut · η
reioniz.
See for neutral beam neutralization and transmission
G Serianni et al. New J. Phys. 19 (2017) 045003.
Beamline Transport
A transverse electric field deflects residual ions inside
the Residual Ion Dump downstream of the gas cell, so only the neutral fraction
reaches the target.
The beamline transmission due to beam divergence is
F = erf(0.007 / ω), and the final beam power delivered to the target is:
P
end = P
out · F · η